Match Up: Electrostatic Sprayer vs. Aerosol Cans

As the founder of Saffelle Inc., I have always strived to stay ahead of the curve in the janitorial and sanitation industry. Our mission has been to provide our clients with the best tools and knowledge to maintain clean and healthy environments. In line with this mission, we made a significant investment in electrostatic sprayer technology before the pandemic hit.

This decision proved to be transformative, as our customers quickly adopted this revolutionary technology for its superior efficiency and effectiveness in sanitizing and disinfecting various spaces. In this article, I will delve into the advantages of using an electrostatic sprayer compared to a traditional aerosol sprayer.

Understanding Electrostatic Sprayer Technology

SAFFELLE.COM

Electrostatic sprayers work by applying a positive or negative charge to liquid disinfectants as they pass through the nozzle. This charge causes the disinfectant droplets to be attracted to surfaces, ensuring even coverage.

The droplets wrap around objects and adhere to all surfaces, including those that are hard to reach with traditional sprayers. This wrap-around effect is one of the key benefits of electrostatic sprayers, providing comprehensive disinfection with minimal effort [2].

Superior Coverage and Efficiency

One of the primary advantages of electrostatic sprayers over aerosol sprayers is their ability to provide more uniform coverage. Traditional aerosol sprayers tend to produce uneven results, often missing nooks and crannies that can harbor harmful pathogens.

Electrostatic sprayers, on the other hand, ensure that disinfectant is evenly distributed across all surfaces, including the undersides and backs of objects. This thorough coverage reduces the likelihood of missed spots and enhances overall cleanliness [1].

Moreover, electrostatic sprayers are designed to minimize chemical waste. The charged droplets are drawn to surfaces, reducing the amount of disinfectant that falls to the ground or evaporates into the air.

This efficient use of disinfectant not only cuts down on waste but also lowers the overall cost of cleaning operations. In contrast, aerosol sprayers can lead to significant overspray, resulting in wasted product and higher costs [6].

Safety and Environmental Benefits

Safety is paramount when it comes to cleaning and disinfection. Electrostatic sprayers offer several safety advantages over aerosol sprayers. For one, the reduced chemical waste means less exposure to potentially harmful substances for both cleaning staff and building occupants. The controlled application also minimizes the risk of inhalation or skin contact with disinfectants.

Furthermore, electrostatic sprayers contribute to a healthier environment by reducing the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Aerosol sprayers, particularly those that use propellants, can release VOCs into the air, contributing to air pollution and posing health risks.

Electrostatic sprayers, by contrast, are more environmentally friendly, making them a safer and more sustainable choice [6].

Superior Coverage and Efficiency

One of the primary advantages of electrostatic sprayers over aerosol sprayers is their ability to provide more uniform coverage. Traditional aerosol sprayers tend to produce uneven results, often missing nooks and crannies that can harbor harmful pathogens.

Electrostatic sprayers, on the other hand, ensure that disinfectant is evenly distributed across all surfaces, including the undersides and backs of objects. This thorough coverage reduces the likelihood of missed spots and enhances overall cleanliness [1].

Cost-Effectiveness

From a cost perspective, electrostatic sprayers offer significant savings over time. While the initial investment in an electrostatic sprayer may be higher than that of an aerosol sprayer, the long-term benefits outweigh the upfront costs.

The efficient use of disinfectants means that less product is needed to achieve the same level of cleanliness, reducing recurring expenses. Additionally, the labor savings from faster and more effective cleaning processes further contribute to the overall cost-effectiveness of electrostatic sprayers [1].

Utilizing gallons to fill electrostatic sprayers results in significant cost savings, regardless of the efficiency of the sprayer. For example, an individual aerosol can containing 16 ounces of product can cost approximately $5.00.

In contrast, a concentrated gallon of disinfectant costing $25.00, when diluted at a ratio of 2 ounces per gallon, produces 64 to 65 gallons of usable solution. Given that there are 128 ounces in a gallon, this equates to approximately 8,200 ounces of disinfectant, which is substantially more product than a single 16-ounce aerosol can.

The Wrap-Around Effect

One of the standout features of electrostatic sprayers is the wrap-around effect. This effect ensures that disinfectant reaches all sides of an object, including the areas that are often overlooked or difficult to reach with traditional spraying methods.

This comprehensive coverage is particularly important in high-touch areas and complex surfaces, where pathogens can easily hide. The wrap-around effect not only enhances the thoroughness of disinfection but also provides peace of mind that all surfaces are properly sanitized [4].

Real-World Validation

The advantages of electrostatic sprayers are not just theoretical; they are backed by real-world studies and validations. Research conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other institutions has demonstrated the effectiveness of electrostatic sprayers in achieving uniform coverage and reducing chemical waste.

These studies have shown that electrostatic sprayers can significantly improve the efficiency and efficacy of disinfection processes compared to conventional sprayers [3].

In one study, the EPA evaluated various sprayers and found that electrostatic sprayers provided superior coverage and reduced the amount of disinfectant needed to achieve desired results.

This validation underscores the benefits of investing in electrostatic sprayer technology for both safety and cost savings [5].

Addressing Common Concerns

While aerosol sprayers are popular for their ease of use and ability to stick to surfaces without running, they have several limitations. Aerosol sprayers often result in uneven application, missed spots, and higher chemical usage.

The benefits of electrostatic sprayers, such as uniform coverage, reduced waste, and enhanced safety, make them a far superior choice for effective disinfection.

Milt’s Cliff Notes

At Saffelle Inc., we are committed to providing our clients with the best tools and technologies to ensure clean and healthy environments. Our investment in electrostatic sprayer technology has proven to be a game-changer, offering numerous advantages over traditional aerosol sprayers. From superior coverage and efficiency to safety and cost-effectiveness, electrostatic sprayers have revolutionized the way we approach cleaning and disinfection.

As we continue to innovate and adapt to the evolving needs of our clients, we remain dedicated to delivering the highest standards of cleanliness and hygiene. Trust Saffelle Inc. to be your partner in achieving spotless spaces and a healthier future.

With an array of equipment, cleaners, and cleaning supplies to utilize for any space, plus equipment training and guidance throughout the process, Saffelles’ “Partnering with a Passion” motto isn’t just a slogan – it’s the way we’ve been doing business for over 53 years.

Schedule with Saffelle today, and let our team put you on the right path for your cleaning needs. 

  1. emist.com – Is An Electrostatic Sprayer Better Than A Regular Sprayer?
  2. safetynetamerica.com – Electrostatic Sprayers Versus Conventional Sprayers
  3. epa.gov – Evaluating Electrostatic Sprayers for Disinfectant Application
  4. sanalifewellness.com – How Electrostatic Sprayers Work?
  5. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov – Chargeability study of disinfectants and the optimization
  6. graco.com – Advantages of Spraying with Electrostatic Guns